<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Twist to the Failed Vonage Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html</link>
	<description>Stock market and investing blog published by Chad Brand, Founder/President of Peridot Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=268#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Yeah, they clarified their comments since it fueled much speculation. Still, saying they will repay the investment banks for any losses is ridiculous. If customers don&#039;t pay, Citi and Goldman should just sue them directly. It&#039;s not Vonage&#039;s responsibility to pay off their bankers just because they feel bad about how the IPO went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they clarified their comments since it fueled much speculation. Still, saying they will repay the investment banks for any losses is ridiculous. If customers don&#8217;t pay, Citi and Goldman should just sue them directly. It&#8217;s not Vonage&#8217;s responsibility to pay off their bankers just because they feel bad about how the IPO went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=268#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Sorry, meant to add some text there.  Looks like Vonage will force customers to buy the IPO.  I&#039;m with you, Chad, time to get on the dark side of this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, meant to add some text there.  Looks like Vonage will force customers to buy the IPO.  I&#8217;m with you, Chad, time to get on the dark side of this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=268#comment-393</guid>
		<description>http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060601/vonage_ipo.html?.v=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060601/vonage_ipo.html?.v=2" rel="nofollow">http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/060601/vonage_ipo.html?.v=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kern</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/05/another-twist-to-failed-vonage-deal.html/comment-page-1#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=268#comment-392</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Vonage would actually be better off losing those customers and keeping the cash the customers promised to pay for their shares.  That is, I can envision a scenario in which the $1700 the customer pays for a round lot might exceed what they might othewise pay the company for service over their lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Vonage would actually be better off losing those customers and keeping the cash the customers promised to pay for their shares.  That is, I can envision a scenario in which the $1700 the customer pays for a round lot might exceed what they might othewise pay the company for service over their lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

