<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisiting the Google/Yahoo Paired Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html</link>
	<description>Stock market and investing blog published by Chad Brand, Founder/President of Peridot Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/comment-page-1#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=295#comment-418</guid>
		<description>You must be a happy man, Chad. Good call. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;JW&lt;br/&gt;The Confused Capitalist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must be a happy man, Chad. Good call. </p>
<p>JW<br />The Confused Capitalist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/comment-page-1#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=295#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Tempted? Of course, but I&#039;m going to stick with it. I still see Yahoo! becoming less and less dominant on the web, and since the valuation gap seems irrational to me, closing out the trade after 24 hours might be leaving a decent amount of money on the table.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google&#039;s report this afternoon will be interesting. If the stock rallies strongly tomorrow I&#039;ll be thrilled, but a disappointment and much of the trade&#039;s gain might evaporate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tempted? Of course, but I&#8217;m going to stick with it. I still see Yahoo! becoming less and less dominant on the web, and since the valuation gap seems irrational to me, closing out the trade after 24 hours might be leaving a decent amount of money on the table.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s report this afternoon will be interesting. If the stock rallies strongly tomorrow I&#8217;ll be thrilled, but a disappointment and much of the trade&#8217;s gain might evaporate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kern</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/comment-page-1#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=295#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Good call, Chad.  Are you tempted to cover after a quick 20% one-day gain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call, Chad.  Are you tempted to cover after a quick 20% one-day gain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/comment-page-1#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=295#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I suggest you reread the post you just commented on. As you will see, long GOOG and short YHOO was exactly the trade that was written about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you reread the post you just commented on. As you will see, long GOOG and short YHOO was exactly the trade that was written about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IM</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2006/07/revisiting-googleyahoo-paired-trade_19.html/comment-page-1#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>IM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=295#comment-414</guid>
		<description>That didn&#039;t work out too well did it ? Maybe Long GOOG and short YHOO might have looked better in retrospect. Well atleast it looks like YHOO at current prices, may  be a very good buy with a one year holding period in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That didn&#8217;t work out too well did it ? Maybe Long GOOG and short YHOO might have looked better in retrospect. Well atleast it looks like YHOO at current prices, may  be a very good buy with a one year holding period in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

