<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why A Negative Savings Rate Isn&#8217;t All That Worrisome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/02/why-negative-savings-rate-isnt-all-that.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/02/why-negative-savings-rate-isnt-all-that.html</link>
	<description>Stock market and investing blog published by Chad Brand, Founder/President of Peridot Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/02/why-negative-savings-rate-isnt-all-that.html/comment-page-1#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=370#comment-471</guid>
		<description>The shift in spending is likely due to historically low interest rates and overall good economic times. So, there is a cyclical component to it, among other things of course.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The point is though, if IRA and 401(k) plans aren&#039;t factored into the statistics, it&#039;s wrong to compare savings rates today with those during the Great Depression. IRA&#039;s and 401(k) plans didn&#039;t exist in the 1930&#039;s, so it&#039;s an apples to oranges comparison.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If someone has a savings rate of negative 1%, but is putting away 5 or 10 percent of their income in a retirement plan, they are indeed saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shift in spending is likely due to historically low interest rates and overall good economic times. So, there is a cyclical component to it, among other things of course.</p>
<p>The point is though, if IRA and 401(k) plans aren&#8217;t factored into the statistics, it&#8217;s wrong to compare savings rates today with those during the Great Depression. IRA&#8217;s and 401(k) plans didn&#8217;t exist in the 1930&#8242;s, so it&#8217;s an apples to oranges comparison.</p>
<p>If someone has a savings rate of negative 1%, but is putting away 5 or 10 percent of their income in a retirement plan, they are indeed saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/02/why-negative-savings-rate-isnt-all-that.html/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=370#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Look at this way: for most of the past century, people spent less than they earned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, they are spending more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That change or shift in spending / savings habit is worth noting. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Remember too that the vast majority of Americans have little in the way of IRA or 401k investment. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So this excess spending is beyond investing, it is consumerism writ large</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at this way: for most of the past century, people spent less than they earned. </p>
<p>Today, they are spending more. </p>
<p>That change or shift in spending / savings habit is worth noting. </p>
<p>Remember too that the vast majority of Americans have little in the way of IRA or 401k investment. </p>
<p>So this excess spending is beyond investing, it is consumerism writ large</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

