<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alright Bernanke, Enough with the Rate Cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html</link>
	<description>Stock market and investing blog published by Chad Brand, Founder/President of Peridot Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=515#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Good question.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the short term stock prices are dictated by any number of things; psychology, emotion, fear, greed, the media, hedge fund traders, rumors, etc. The fundamentals don&#039;t always matter. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Over the long term stock prices are dictated by corporate earnings. The fundamentals do matter over time because of what a share of stock actually is, a piece of ownership in a business that entitles the holder to a representative share of the business&#039;s profits.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To me, one is far easier to predict accurately than the other. Said another way, my &quot;batting average&quot; predicting long term earnings patterns will be much higher than one trying to predict what the market will do today, next week, or next month. It really comes down to the definition of a contrarian value investor and what they are trying to accomplish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.</p>
<p>In the short term stock prices are dictated by any number of things; psychology, emotion, fear, greed, the media, hedge fund traders, rumors, etc. The fundamentals don&#8217;t always matter. </p>
<p>Over the long term stock prices are dictated by corporate earnings. The fundamentals do matter over time because of what a share of stock actually is, a piece of ownership in a business that entitles the holder to a representative share of the business&#8217;s profits.</p>
<p>To me, one is far easier to predict accurately than the other. Said another way, my &#8220;batting average&#8221; predicting long term earnings patterns will be much higher than one trying to predict what the market will do today, next week, or next month. It really comes down to the definition of a contrarian value investor and what they are trying to accomplish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=515#comment-747</guid>
		<description>How can you say that you have no idea about what is going to happen in the short term but be so confident that you know what is going to happen in the long term?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say that you have no idea about what is going to happen in the short term but be so confident that you know what is going to happen in the long term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=515#comment-746</guid>
		<description>I agree about the short term, but I&#039;m a long term &quot;investor&quot; not a short term &quot;trader&quot; so I am content with the fact that I have no idea what will happen to the market in the short term.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for Cramer, well, hopefully there aren&#039;t too many of my readers who are using his advice to manage their own accounts. Remember, he used to be in the investment advice business but quit to be in the entertainment business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the short term, but I&#8217;m a long term &#8220;investor&#8221; not a short term &#8220;trader&#8221; so I am content with the fact that I have no idea what will happen to the market in the short term.</p>
<p>As for Cramer, well, hopefully there aren&#8217;t too many of my readers who are using his advice to manage their own accounts. Remember, he used to be in the investment advice business but quit to be in the entertainment business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=515#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I meant to say call.  Sorry.  I&#039;ll ty to hold on.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I just dont see anything that will get people excited about banks in the near term but I guess that is why it is trading here now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say call.  Sorry.  I&#8217;ll ty to hold on.  </p>
<p>I just dont see anything that will get people excited about banks in the near term but I guess that is why it is trading here now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/11/alright-bernanke-enough-with-rate-cuts.html/comment-page-1#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=515#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Re: BAC&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Just to clarify, the trade idea was to buy BAC (it was around $48), sell the May 2008 calls at $1.75, and collect six months worth of dividends ($1.28). All of this would result in a breakeven point of around $45 per share. The stock today is $44 and change on renewed worries about the health of the banking sector.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As with every contrarian investment, a long term time horizon is imperative. I have no idea what will happen in the short term, especially in the financial sector where psychology and fear is driving market movements.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t know you personally, so I can&#039;t speak to what you should do specifically. That said, if you share my belief that this credit crunch will resolve itself at some point, and you are patient and have the time to wait it out, I do like BAC as a contrarian investment. They have less mortgage exposure than JPM and C, and I do think they&#039;ll come out of all this just fine. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The short term though, is anybody&#039;s guess. My trade idea was based on the fact that I felt good about having a breakeven point of $45 per share in May of 2008. I still feel that way, and still own BAC shares, even though near term volatility is clearly here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: BAC</p>
<p>Just to clarify, the trade idea was to buy BAC (it was around $48), sell the May 2008 calls at $1.75, and collect six months worth of dividends ($1.28). All of this would result in a breakeven point of around $45 per share. The stock today is $44 and change on renewed worries about the health of the banking sector.</p>
<p>As with every contrarian investment, a long term time horizon is imperative. I have no idea what will happen in the short term, especially in the financial sector where psychology and fear is driving market movements.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know you personally, so I can&#8217;t speak to what you should do specifically. That said, if you share my belief that this credit crunch will resolve itself at some point, and you are patient and have the time to wait it out, I do like BAC as a contrarian investment. They have less mortgage exposure than JPM and C, and I do think they&#8217;ll come out of all this just fine. </p>
<p>The short term though, is anybody&#8217;s guess. My trade idea was based on the fact that I felt good about having a breakeven point of $45 per share in May of 2008. I still feel that way, and still own BAC shares, even though near term volatility is clearly here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

