<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barron&#8217;s Pans Buffett&#8217;s Berkshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html</link>
	<description>Chad Brand&#039;s stock market and investing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:02:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weeks Top Stories at Value Investing News Value Plays</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html/comment-page-1#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weeks Top Stories at Value Investing News Value Plays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=532#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>[...] 7. Barron&#8217;s Pans Buffett&#8217;s Berkshire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7. Barron&#8217;s Pans Buffett&#8217;s Berkshire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html/comment-page-1#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=532#comment-788</guid>
		<description>nevermind the last comment, my bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nevermind the last comment, my bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html/comment-page-1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=532#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Consensus estimates for 2007 EPS is $6,297 per share, which gives BRK a P/E of 21+ or so. Yahoo! Finance lists the P/E as 15, but you can&#039;t take that number at face value a lot of the time (computers don&#039;t take out one-time items when calcuating ratios for web sites). So I think that&#039;s how Barron&#039;s figured the P/E (using operating earnings). For non-operating income (stocks, etc) you add in the value of public investments.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think BRK will (and should) carry a premium while he is alive and well, but the real question is, does that premium go down a bit when someone else is running the show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consensus estimates for 2007 EPS is $6,297 per share, which gives BRK a P/E of 21+ or so. Yahoo! Finance lists the P/E as 15, but you can&#8217;t take that number at face value a lot of the time (computers don&#8217;t take out one-time items when calcuating ratios for web sites). So I think that&#8217;s how Barron&#8217;s figured the P/E (using operating earnings). For non-operating income (stocks, etc) you add in the value of public investments.</p>
<p>I think BRK will (and should) carry a premium while he is alive and well, but the real question is, does that premium go down a bit when someone else is running the show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentex</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2007/12/barrons-pans-buffetts-berkshire.html/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=532#comment-783</guid>
		<description>First, BRK&#039;s P/E is roughly 15, not 20+.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second, I would suggest a better quick and dirty valuation would be done in three parts: 1- Insurance, 2- Operating Companies, 3- Stock/Bond Portfolio.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1. Insurance based on revenue (1x) and eps (8x) multiples is worth 40+ billion.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. Operating companies have ttm earnings of ~$5billion.  With a 13x multiple that&#039;s worth $65 billion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. Stock and Bonds worth ~$100 billion.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Total = 40+65+100 = 205 billion which is roughly equal to the market cap at today&#039;s prices ($135k per A share).  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;$47 billion in cash is not counted here and assumed to be needed for insurance operations.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;IMO, this is a conservative valuation.  18% overvalued -- not so much, mildly overvalued at $150k per A share -- perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, BRK&#8217;s P/E is roughly 15, not 20+.</p>
<p>Second, I would suggest a better quick and dirty valuation would be done in three parts: 1- Insurance, 2- Operating Companies, 3- Stock/Bond Portfolio.</p>
<p>1. Insurance based on revenue (1x) and eps (8x) multiples is worth 40+ billion.  </p>
<p>2. Operating companies have ttm earnings of ~$5billion.  With a 13x multiple that&#8217;s worth $65 billion</p>
<p>3. Stock and Bonds worth ~$100 billion.</p>
<p>Total = 40+65+100 = 205 billion which is roughly equal to the market cap at today&#8217;s prices ($135k per A share).  </p>
<p>$47 billion in cash is not counted here and assumed to be needed for insurance operations.</p>
<p>IMO, this is a conservative valuation.  18% overvalued &#8212; not so much, mildly overvalued at $150k per A share &#8212; perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
