<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BAC/CFC Baseball Analogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html</link>
	<description>Chad Brand&#039;s stock market and investing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:40:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html/comment-page-1#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=537#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Alex,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I included the $2 billion they already invested in CFC&#039;s convertible preferred stock. The media has been wrongly reporting for a while now that BAC lost most of that investment because the preferred was convertible at $18 and now the stock is $6. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They ignore that BAC has the option to convert at $18 but doesn&#039;t have to (and they won&#039;t). However, while they are buying all the shares for ~$6, they also will not really get all of their $2 billion plus interest back, because when they own CFC they&#039;ll just be paying themselves the principal and interest out of their own pocket. Hence, in reality, their purchase price is more than $4.1 billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>I included the $2 billion they already invested in CFC&#8217;s convertible preferred stock. The media has been wrongly reporting for a while now that BAC lost most of that investment because the preferred was convertible at $18 and now the stock is $6. </p>
<p>They ignore that BAC has the option to convert at $18 but doesn&#8217;t have to (and they won&#8217;t). However, while they are buying all the shares for ~$6, they also will not really get all of their $2 billion plus interest back, because when they own CFC they&#8217;ll just be paying themselves the principal and interest out of their own pocket. Hence, in reality, their purchase price is more than $4.1 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html/comment-page-1#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=537#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to point out purchase price is 4.1 Billion,which would make the deal sweeter for BAC. :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;-Alex&lt;br/&gt;http://www.lacontra.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to point out purchase price is 4.1 Billion,which would make the deal sweeter for BAC. <img src='http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Alex<br /><a href="http://www.lacontra.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.lacontra.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Nusbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html/comment-page-1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Nusbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=537#comment-797</guid>
		<description>&quot;Countrywide earned between $2.2 billion and $2.7 billion in profit every year between 2003 and 2006.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I hear the Stankees need pitching! Why not sign Gibson, Koufax and Seaver? They all used to be 20 winners!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Countrywide earned between $2.2 billion and $2.7 billion in profit every year between 2003 and 2006.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I hear the Stankees need pitching! Why not sign Gibson, Koufax and Seaver? They all used to be 20 winners!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/01/baccfc-baseball-analogy.html/comment-page-1#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=537#comment-796</guid>
		<description>&quot;home run&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;yea, then we can do this all over again. Maybe the next liquidity crisis will be more like the panic of 1907. Glass-Steagal had a purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;home run&#8221; </p>
<p>yea, then we can do this all over again. Maybe the next liquidity crisis will be more like the panic of 1907. Glass-Steagal had a purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
