<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natural Gas Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/03/natural-gas-update.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/03/natural-gas-update.html</link>
	<description>Stock market and investing blog published by Chad Brand, Founder/President of Peridot Capital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Brand</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/03/natural-gas-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=565#comment-851</guid>
		<description>see today&#039;s post on chk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see today&#8217;s post on chk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madhatter</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/03/natural-gas-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>madhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=565#comment-849</guid>
		<description>after reading your old post, i&#039;m just curious as to why you personally like CHK out of the bunch?  based on fundamentals alone, it seems like DVN or SJT might be a better play on nat gas (even though i realize the latter is a trust).  Does CHK have something that I&#039;m missing?  Because their fundies seem to put them in the middle of the pack as just &#039;average&#039; in terms of nat gas players.  thanks for your thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after reading your old post, i&#8217;m just curious as to why you personally like CHK out of the bunch?  based on fundamentals alone, it seems like DVN or SJT might be a better play on nat gas (even though i realize the latter is a trust).  Does CHK have something that I&#8217;m missing?  Because their fundies seem to put them in the middle of the pack as just &#8216;average&#8217; in terms of nat gas players.  thanks for your thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

