<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Buy &amp; Hold&quot; Is Dead? I Think Not.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/11/buy-hold-is-dead-i-think-not.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/11/buy-hold-is-dead-i-think-not.html</link>
	<description>Chad Brand&#039;s stock market and investing blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:02:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt (Your Roth IRA)</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/11/buy-hold-is-dead-i-think-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt (Your Roth IRA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=672#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Buy and hold is definitely still alive.  Despite the previous comment&#039;s beliefs, plenty of buy and hold investors made money in the market over the past ten years.  I know from experience.  From 2004-2005, I bought and held shares of Anheuser-Busch (BUD) for between $41 and $44 per share.  I got paid dividends each quarter, and despite wanted to hold onto BUD forever, I was forced to sell in December 2008 for $68 per share.  That&#039;s a 50%+ return during a time the market was down.

My buy and hold strategy on several other individual stocks has worked well.  And although I haven&#039;t done it myself, my guess is that total market ETF investors who have reinvested their dividends over the last ten years are also ahead and beating the market...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy and hold is definitely still alive.  Despite the previous comment&#8217;s beliefs, plenty of buy and hold investors made money in the market over the past ten years.  I know from experience.  From 2004-2005, I bought and held shares of Anheuser-Busch (BUD) for between $41 and $44 per share.  I got paid dividends each quarter, and despite wanted to hold onto BUD forever, I was forced to sell in December 2008 for $68 per share.  That&#8217;s a 50%+ return during a time the market was down.</p>
<p>My buy and hold strategy on several other individual stocks has worked well.  And although I haven&#8217;t done it myself, my guess is that total market ETF investors who have reinvested their dividends over the last ten years are also ahead and beating the market&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/2008/11/buy-hold-is-dead-i-think-not.html/comment-page-1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/?p=672#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Yes, buy &amp; hold is dead.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Even if you dollar cost averaged through the 2000s, you&#039;re mostly underwater (at least I am). Adjusted for inflation, I have lost quite a bit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your entire thesis points to the view that buy &amp; hold is stupid. You claim stocks were overvalued in the late 90s. That means sell.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You claim their are undervalued now. That means buy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The lesson? Value matters everwhere and always. Buy and hold is a chump&#039;s game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, buy &amp; hold is dead.</p>
<p>Even if you dollar cost averaged through the 2000s, you&#39;re mostly underwater (at least I am). Adjusted for inflation, I have lost quite a bit.</p>
<p>Your entire thesis points to the view that buy &amp; hold is stupid. You claim stocks were overvalued in the late 90s. That means sell.</p>
<p>You claim their are undervalued now. That means buy.</p>
<p>The lesson? Value matters everwhere and always. Buy and hold is a chump&#39;s game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
