Amazon Shares Pierce $1,430 And Sit Firmly Above 3x 2018 Forecasted Revenue

Valuing shares of Amazon (AMZN) has always been a difficult task since the company does not at all care about short-term profit margins. Investors are left with trying to estimate, based on the company’s various businesses, how large each will get and what type of margins will likely be achieved once each reaches maturity.

Of course, such an approach becomes nearly impossible when you have no sense of which businesses Amazon will choose to enter over time (or maybe the better question is which they will “not” enter). Traditional retail was one thing, but now with cloud services and advertising revenue, margins are going to be all over the map.

I recently trimmed many of my clients’ positions, as I have done once or twice since I made the investments beginning in 2014. My methodology has been inexact, to account for the aforementioned issues regarding Amazon’s various ventures, but it generally involves looking at AMZN on a price-to-sales basis and then seeing what margin/multiple assumptions are baked into such valuations. For instance, if you think they will ultimately earn a 10% profit margin at maturity, you might be willing to pay 20 or 30 times normalized profits, which would equate to 2-3 times annual revenue.

Given the company’s growth, my personal view is that anything up to 3x revenue is at least somewhat reasonable, as I don’t see margins going above 10% given the company’s desire to remain value-based in the eyes of consumers, and anything over 30x profits for a growth company makes me nervous. And if someone argued that they will never reach 10% margins and a 30x multiple is too high, I can totally understand that view. I just think some valuation flexibility is warranted given that Bezos might actually get as close as anyone in business to total world domination.

So below I have posted updated graphs that show Amazon’s stock price over the last two decades or so (not very helpful when trying to evaluate the valuation), as well as their year-end price to trailing 12-month revenue ratio (far more helpful in doing so). Note: the 2018 data points are based on today’s stock price and consensus 2018 sales estimates.

As you can see, AMZN stock hovered around the 2.0x price-to-sales ratio level between 2004 and 2014, with a range of 1.5x-2.5x or so. In recent years, as momentum stocks have led the market higher, that number has surpassed 3x and currently sits around 3.2x.

Given that position sizing in portfolios is always important to me, this graph tells me that now is not a bad time to trim AMZN. Trading above 3x revenue would seem to indicate that investor sentiment is quite high. There may be good reasons for that, of course, but as the company gets bigger and bigger, its growth rate is sure to slow. In fact, in order to grow by the 29% rate that Wall Street analysts are expecting in 2018, total sales need to rise by a stunning $51.5 billion. That very well might happen (and acquisitions like Whole Foods will only help), but when growth slows to only 10 or 15%, investors might not want to pay 3.2x revenue any longer. In my mind, anything above 3.0x tells me to tread carefully.

What do you all think? What kind of profit margins do you think AMZN will earn at maturity (i.e. when its growth rate is in-line with the average company)? What multiple of revenue seems right to you?

Full Disclosure: Long shares of Amazon at the time of writing (even after selling a chunk at $1,400 recently), but positions may change at any time

8 thoughts on “Amazon Shares Pierce $1,430 And Sit Firmly Above 3x 2018 Forecasted Revenue”

  1. Amazon is comprised of at least 4 distinct businesses. It’s harder to figure out the appropriate margin for a blend of these businesses than for each one. Even so, as the higher margin businesses get bigger, the price to sales ratio should also get bigger. Therefore what “worked” in the past is not necessarily relevant in the future. Separately valuing the 1P, 3P, AWS and advertising businesses will be more helpful to you. That said, I am also finding AMZN’s valuation to be stretched. It seems that everyday, another analyst is coming out with a higher price target and today’s announcement of their foray into healthcare will also stoke the imagination. At some point, share price momentum must stop. It has been astonishing.

    1. I agree completely and that is how I determine what blended PSR I feel is reasonable. And yes, over time the business mix will change, so it helps to use one’s long-term assumption on that item, as opposed to where it is today (or at least use both as a range to help evaluate things).

  2. One more thing to add here that I missed. Corporate tax rates have meaningfully declined. You might not thing that matters since “AMZN doesn’t pay taxes” but while thinking about normalized operating margins, one also needs to consider normalized net margins. That has meaningfully changed and affects valuation. Just when you think you’re smarter than the market…it’s time to learn an embarrassing lesson.

    1. If one is using a DCF model then tax rates will have a material impact. If you are using comps, however, it really won’t change things because all comps follow the same tax rules. For instance, if I use Costco as a comp for Amazon’s direct/1P retail business, and use a similar PSR for that piece of the puzzle, the new tax law is not going to require I change my model at all.

      1. All things being equal, if net margins go up PSRs will also go up, but they will go up the same for both AMZN and a Costco comp. I think that is what you’re saying. While you can use the same PSR as a comparable company, would you agree that the PSR would need to increase with lower taxes (and higher net margins)? Thanks for your comments.

        1. All else equal, yes, PSR would go up some. But for a low-margin business like Amazon 1P or Costco, it is going to be very minimal (e.g. Costco only earns 2% net margins).

Comments are closed.